Comments on: Revisionist Short Term History http://www.simpleprop.com/2009/01/15/revisionist-short-term-history/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:16:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: monkey http://www.simpleprop.com/2009/01/15/revisionist-short-term-history/comment-page-1/#comment-13781 monkey Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:14:43 +0000 http://www.simpleprop.com/?p=725#comment-13781 Ok: google 'infused transparency' First, I get the suggestion that perhaps I meant 'induced transparency' followed by results for 'electromagentically induced transparency' and 'plasmon induced transparency'. The top four results for 'infused transparency' are about a 'resin infused transparent skin panel' and don't even contain the first search term. The white house comes in at 6, and sp.com at 9. Not even the internet thinks 'infused transparency' is a legitimate pairing of english words... ladies and gentlemen, the 43rd president of the united states of america. Ok: google ‘infused transparency’

First, I get the suggestion that perhaps I meant ‘induced transparency’ followed by results for ‘electromagentically induced transparency’ and ‘plasmon induced transparency’.

The top four results for ‘infused transparency’ are about a ‘resin infused transparent skin panel’ and don’t even contain the first search term. The white house comes in at 6, and sp.com at 9.

Not even the internet thinks ‘infused transparency’ is a legitimate pairing of english words… ladies and gentlemen, the 43rd president of the united states of america.

]]> By: Amy http://www.simpleprop.com/2009/01/15/revisionist-short-term-history/comment-page-1/#comment-13600 Amy Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:51:46 +0000 http://www.simpleprop.com/?p=725#comment-13600 Who knew transparency could be infused? A consultant totally wrote all of that - it's all about the spin, baby. Who knew transparency could be infused? A consultant totally wrote all of that – it’s all about the spin, baby.

]]> By: alex http://www.simpleprop.com/2009/01/15/revisionist-short-term-history/comment-page-1/#comment-13446 alex Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:48:26 +0000 http://www.simpleprop.com/?p=725#comment-13446 Oh, and wadE, I'd just like to say that I'm proud of you for having the ability to read that. My eyes glazed over just reading your summation. Oh, and wadE, I’d just like to say that I’m proud of you for having the ability to read that. My eyes glazed over just reading your summation.

]]> By: alex http://www.simpleprop.com/2009/01/15/revisionist-short-term-history/comment-page-1/#comment-13445 alex Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:47:52 +0000 http://www.simpleprop.com/?p=725#comment-13445 I don't agree with "kept America safe". Regardless of whether or not you think Bush was solely responsible for 9/11, he's been pushing around the idea that he prevented <I>another</I> attack on American soil. The World Trade Center was bombed in 1993. Six people died, one thousand were injured. He did, however, prevent <I>another</I> another attack on American soil. Good for him. I don’t agree with “kept America safe”. Regardless of whether or not you think Bush was solely responsible for 9/11, he’s been pushing around the idea that he prevented another attack on American soil. The World Trade Center was bombed in 1993. Six people died, one thousand were injured. He did, however, prevent another another attack on American soil. Good for him.

]]>